Prediction of Grades for Reviewing with Automated Peer-review and Reputation Metrics
نویسندگان
چکیده
Peer review is an effective and useful method for improving students’ learning through review by student peers. Peer review has been used in classes for several decades. To ensure the success of peer review, research challenges such as the quality of peer review must be addressed. It is challenging to identify how good the reviewer is. We develop a prediction model to assess students’ reviewing capability. We investigate several important factors that influence students’ reviewing capability, which corresponds to instructor-assigned grades for reviewing. We use machine learning techniques algorithms to build models for grade prediction for reviewing. Our models are based on the several metrics such as the reviewer assigning different scores to different rubric items and automated metrics to assess the textual feedback given by the reviewers. To improve the models, we also use reputation score of students’ as reviewers. We present results of experiments to show the effectiveness of the models.
منابع مشابه
The Role of Initial Input in Reputation Systems to Generate Accurate Aggregated Grades from Peer Assessment
High-quality peer assessment has many benefits. It can not only offer students a chance to learn from their peers but also help teaching staff to decide on grades of student work. There are many ways to do quality control for educational peer review, such as a calibration process, a reputation system, etc. Previous research has shown that reputation systems can help to produce more accurate agg...
متن کاملReputation Risk Management in the Framework of Enterprise Risk Management: Evidences from an Active Financial Institution in the Capital Market of Iran
Reputation risk as one of the most important risks in any competitive industry and market should be considered before all the risks of the enterprise which also affects other risks. This research aims to review and manage reputation risk in the framework of enterprise risk management. Considering the importance of the subject and lack of available studies in this field, the innovation of presen...
متن کاملWho Took Peer Review Seriously: Another Perspective on Student-Generated Quizzes
In educational peer-review activities, one challenge is to tell which peer reviews are credible. Reputation systems are one approach. However, they work best in a scenario where (i) most of the peer reviewers can do a decent job, or (ii) reviewers tend to do peer-reviews in fixed styles─e.g., negative reviewers are negative on all artifacts they review; accurate reviewers grade all work accurat...
متن کاملCrowdGrader : Crowdsourcing the Evaluation of Homework Assignments ∗ Technical Report UCSC - SOE - 13 - 11 August 2013
Crowdsourcing offers a practical method for ranking and scoring large amounts of items. To investigate the algorithms and incentives that can be used in crowdsourcing quality evaluations, we built CrowdGrader, a tool that lets students submit and collaboratively grade solutions to homework assignments. We present the algorithms and techniques used in CrowdGrader, and we describe our results and...
متن کاملIncentivizing anonymous “peer-to-peer” reviews
The review cycle for papers takes way too long in many disciplines. The problem is that while authors want to have their own papers reviewed fast, that are often unwilling to review the papers of others in a timely manner. This paper explores what would be required to incentivize fast reviews using a public reputation/scoring system that exploits the fact that the referees are drawn from the sa...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2016